OvertheCounter
    Twitter LinkedIn
    • Email Newsletters
    • Magazine Subscriptions
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    Twitter LinkedIn
    CPD Log-In
    OvertheCounter
    • News
      • Dairy / Beef
      • Sheep
      • Pigs / Poultry
      • Equine
      • Companion
      • Retail
      • Training
    • Magazines
      1. May 2026
      2. March 2026
      3. January 2026
      4. November 2025
      5. September 2025
      6. July 2025
      7. May 2025
      Featured

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      By Simon KingMay 18, 2026
      Recent

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      May 18, 2026

      Over the Counter – March 2026

      March 17, 2026

      Over the Counter – January 2026

      January 12, 2026
    • CPD Training
      • AMTRA CPD Modules
        • Frontline Academy
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
        • Are you a Gold Standard SQP?
      • VETPOL CPD Modules
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD Modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
      • Earning CPD points with overthecounter.news
      • CPD Log-In
      • Wormstock 2023
    • National SQP Awards
    OvertheCounter
    Companion

    Vet programme sparks pet food controversy

    Carolyn HendersonBy Carolyn HendersonMay 4, 2017No Comments3 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

    The Pet Food Manufacturers Association says a BBC2 programme which claimed many pet foods failed to meet regulatory guidelines was an “unbalanced and inaccurate portrayal of the industry.”

    Trust Me, I’m a Vet, fronted by small animal vet and TV celebrity Steve Leonard, was broadcast on 3 May and looked at research from Nottingham University into pet food mineral contents. Dr Mike Davies analysed the mineral content of 200 pet foods and tested them against 11 European guidelines.

    Dr Davies reported a “significant difference” between wet and dry foods. He said that only 7% passed all guidelines and that “93% of the worst offenders did not meet with six out of 11 guidelines.” He said that of dry foods tested, 38% passed all the guidelines and added, “We were surprised that we found so many were out of normal reference ranges.”

    He said that wet foods usually have animal or fish derivatives according to what was on the open market and said manufacturers should test more batches, more frequently to ensure they were within the guidelines.

    “The biggest question is who is policing this marketplace,” he said. “It doesn’t appear that anyone is actually checking pet foods on the market are complying with guidelines.”

    In a statement issued after the programme was broadcast, the PFMA said: “Conversations with representatives of Nottingham University have led us to question the research methodology and testing regime used in this study, which does not meet the strict legal requirements our members routinely follow when testing their own products. We also note that the Nottingham University laboratory is not accredited to carry out tests on pet food.

    “We are disappointed that Nottingham University have to date failed to provide requested details of their study and the products tested so that manufacturers can investigate this matter further.  We are also disappointed that despite discussing our concerns in detail with the BBC, they have broadcast the piece despite the obvious shortcomings in the research, which has led to an unbalanced and inaccurate portrayal of the industry.

    “PFMA members regularly test their own products to ensure compliance with industry standards using recognised, validated methods which are set in EU legislation. This is done either internally or with external labs that are accredited for pet food testing. The results recorded by our members report a very high level of compliance. In the unusual event of non-compliant results, they have robust procedures in place to address and rectify any formulation issues.

    It said that the PFMA has “good contact” with the veterinary profession and monitors all issues related to animal health. “If vets were seeing widespread problems because of mineral deficiency in dogs and cats, we would be aware of this,” it added.

     

    Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
    Previous ArticleVMD statement on product recall
    Next Article Looking for links between worm egg counts and stress
    Carolyn Henderson

    Read Similar Stories

    Beaphar refreshes non-brushing dental range for cats and dogs

    Vets warn dog owners of fatal risks of walks during scorching Bank Holiday weather

    Pet owners reveal what matters most when choosing products for their animals

    Most Read

    Farms hold key to break rodenticide resistance spread

    June 3, 2026

    New calculator helps optimise pig and broiler feed strategies

    June 2, 2026

    New environmental index launched to cut UK sheep flock carbon footprint

    June 1, 2026

    Any animal medicine advertising or promotion should conform to the ‘code of practice’ of the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH).
    For full details contact the publisher or www.noah.co.uk.

    Lewis Business Media Ltd endeavours to make articles and statements as accurate as possible.

    © 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
    Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

    Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

    The OTC "tick" mechanism is the copyright of Lewis Business Media Ltd ©2025

    • Pet Business World
    • Pest

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    OvertheCounter
    Managing Your Privacy

    To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    Cookie Preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}