OvertheCounter
    Twitter LinkedIn
    • Email Newsletters
    • Magazine Subscriptions
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    Twitter LinkedIn
    CPD Log-In
    OvertheCounter
    • News
      • Dairy / Beef
      • Sheep
      • Pigs / Poultry
      • Equine
      • Companion
      • Retail
      • Training
    • Magazines
      1. May 2026
      2. March 2026
      3. January 2026
      4. November 2025
      5. September 2025
      6. July 2025
      7. May 2025
      Featured

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      By Simon KingMay 18, 2026
      Recent

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      May 18, 2026

      Over the Counter – March 2026

      March 17, 2026

      Over the Counter – January 2026

      January 12, 2026
    • CPD Training
      • AMTRA CPD Modules
        • Frontline Academy
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
        • Are you a Gold Standard SQP?
      • VETPOL CPD Modules
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD Modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
      • Earning CPD points with overthecounter.news
      • CPD Log-In
      • Wormstock 2023
    • National SQP Awards
    OvertheCounter
    News

    NOAH asks if landlords are really against pets in rentals

    mmBy Simon KingOctober 19, 2022No Comments4 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

    According to Government data, only 7% of properties on the UK rental market are advertised as pet-friendly. 

    This figure is not surprising, perhaps, given that landlords have historically felt they are unable to put in place sufficient protection for their properties against any damage they fear pets may cause.

    Yet, despite the number of properties advertised as pet-friendly declining in recent years, new research from the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH) shows that landlords are not actually as against pet ownership in rental properties as might be assumed.

    As part of its ‘Renting with Pets’ campaign, NOAH undertook three-month long surveys with both landlord and tenant groups, asking a range of questions to understand how pet ownership in rentals could be achieved, and to learn of previous experiences from both groups.

    NOAH’s recently published report found that whilst landlords have concerns about renting to tenants with pets, 28% of landlords were in favour of improving access to pets in rental properties if better protections for landlords are introduced, whilst a further 18% supported access to pets in rental properties generally. 

    A further 53% stated that pet ownership is important, compared to only 3% who stated it was not.

    Perhaps the most telling finding from the survey was that 70% of landlords felt that more protections need to be in place for landlords that do allow tenants to keep pets.

    One respondent said that the Tenant Fees Act (2019) – which restricts landlords to take a five-week maximum deposit in all cases – had meant they were unable to continue letting to pet owners as this deposit simply would not cover the costs associated with pet damage if caused.

    This sentiment was echoed in the Heads for Tails! report by AdvoCATS in 2021, which found that one-in-five landlords who previously allowed pets, no longer do as a direct result of the Tenant Fees Act being introduced.

    When discussing the measures that would help landlords feel comfortable renting to tenants with pets, the NOAH report explains that appropriate options could include allowing an increased deposit to be taken to specifically cover pet damage (34%), charging tenants an increased rental rate or ‘pet premium’ (24%) or allowing an insurance policy to be taken out to cover damage caused by pets (17%).

    The ability to retain the option to choose whether or not to allow pets was important to many according to the report, which highlighted that landlords sometimes do not allow pets due to concerns about the suitability of a specific property for pet health and wellbeing, as opposed to misgivings about pets in general.

    NOAH is among many who welcome the proposals from the long-awaited Renters Reform White Paper that includes plans to allow tenants to request to own a pet in a rental property, which under new rules, landlords cannot unreasonably refuse.

    In an effort to better protect landlords against potential pet damage, the White Paper also proposes to reform the Tenant Fees Act (2019) to enable landlords to request tenants to purchase pet insurance as part of their rental agreement, a measure that was supported by 17% of respondents to NOAH’s survey.

    NOAH chief executive Dawn Howard said: “Owning a pet has significant benefits for human health – both physical and mental – yet it has historically been very challenging in the UK to rent with a pet in private accommodation. 

    “Despite what is believed, our own research has shown that many landlords are not necessarily against allowing pets as long as their assets are protected. This finding backs up the changes being proposed in the Renters Reform White Paper and should encourage the Government to move forward with the proposals at pace.”

    Mrs Howard continued: “The additional protection set to be introduced will ensure that responsible pet owners can keep a pet in their rental home, meanwhile landlords can rest assured that any pet damage that may be caused during the tenancy is covered through a pet insurance policy. 

    “In all, the Government’s proposed rental reforms represent a positive move for responsible pet owners in the rental sector, and a win for landlords who can now widen their pool of rental tenants whilst being fully insured against any potential pet damage.”

    To view the report, click HERE.

    Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
    Previous ArticleRegister now for this week’s Munch & Learn CPD event
    Next Article Pets at Home to close all stores on Boxing Day in recognition of staff’s hard work
    mm
    Simon King

    Editor - Over The Counter. Simon has more than 20 years’ experience in B2B publishing. When not slumped over his PC, Simon is a keen follower of sport, supporting Manchester United, and is at his absolute happiest watching most sport in glorious UHD, with something cold to drink by his side.

    Read Similar Stories

    Pet owners reveal what matters most when choosing products for their animals

    Provita unveils strategic sales alliance with Norbrook

    Elanco completes acquisition of AHV

    Most Read

    Pet owners reveal what matters most when choosing products for their animals

    May 19, 2026

    Over the Counter – May 2026

    May 18, 2026

    Provita unveils strategic sales alliance with Norbrook

    May 18, 2026

    Any animal medicine advertising or promotion should conform to the ‘code of practice’ of the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH).
    For full details contact the publisher or www.noah.co.uk.

    Lewis Business Media Ltd endeavours to make articles and statements as accurate as possible.

    © 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
    Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

    Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

    The OTC "tick" mechanism is the copyright of Lewis Business Media Ltd ©2025

    • Pet Business World
    • Pest

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    OvertheCounter
    Managing Your Privacy

    To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    Cookie Preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}