OvertheCounter
    Twitter LinkedIn
    • Email Newsletters
    • Magazine Subscriptions
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    Twitter LinkedIn
    CPD Log-In
    OvertheCounter
    • News
      • Dairy / Beef
      • Sheep
      • Pigs / Poultry
      • Equine
      • Companion
      • Retail
      • Training
    • Magazines
      1. May 2026
      2. March 2026
      3. January 2026
      4. November 2025
      5. September 2025
      6. July 2025
      7. May 2025
      Featured

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      By Simon KingMay 18, 2026
      Recent

      Over the Counter – May 2026

      May 18, 2026

      Over the Counter – March 2026

      March 17, 2026

      Over the Counter – January 2026

      January 12, 2026
    • CPD Training
      • AMTRA CPD Modules
        • Frontline Academy
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
        • Are you a Gold Standard SQP?
      • VETPOL CPD Modules
        • Companion Animal CPD Modules
        • Equine CPD Modules
        • Livestock CPD Modules
        • Poultry CPD Modules
      • Earning CPD points with overthecounter.news
      • CPD Log-In
      • Wormstock 2023
    • National SQP Awards
    OvertheCounter
    News

    BVA brands CMA’s vet medicines proposals ‘unreasonable’ and ‘ineffective’

    mmBy Simon KingNovember 17, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

    The British Veterinary Association (BVA) said it has serious concerns that proposals around the prescribing and sale of medicines are anti-competitive and are unlikely to reduce vet bills for pet owners.

    The CMA report sets out 21 proposed measures aimed at improving competition in the vet market.

    BVA welcomes the CMA’s proposals aimed at increasing transparency and choice for consumers including: increased information about practice ownership; standardised price lists; written estimates; and itemised bills.

    It also welcomes the CMA’s support for reform of the Veterinary Surgeons Act and the need for practice regulation.

    However, the association said it has serious concerns around some of the CMA’s proposals relating to veterinary medicines which it sees as ‘anti-competitive’ and unlikely to reduce vet bills for consumers.

    New data from BVA’s Voice of the Veterinary Profession survey revealed that 64% of vets say the CMA’s proposal requiring vets to inform clients about savings they can make buying medicines online would have a negative impact on the financial sustainability of their practice, with 65% also stating that a £16 cap on prescriptions would also risk practice viability.

    In addition, the research shows that many practices are already implementing the CMA’s measures with 79% already providing itemised bills and 80% reporting they provide written estimates for work over £500 on all or most occasions.

    Responding to the CMA’s provisional decision, BVA president Dr Rob Williams MRCVS said: “The measures outlined in the CMA’s provisional decision report are much more measured and proportionate compared to earlier proposals and that clearly shows they have listened to our concerns.

    “As vets, we welcome the measures that increase transparency and help us to better support our clients. However, it’s vital that the CMA gets the detail right or it risks unintended negative consequences.

    “BVA particularly welcomes the CMA backing our calls for reform of the outdated Veterinary Surgeons Act, including the need for practice regulation. Vets have been pressing for reform of this woefully outdated legislation for many years, and reform will go a long way to addressing many of the concerns raised throughout the CMA investigation and will help build trust with our clients.

    “We do, however, have serious concerns about the medicines proposals – it is simply unreasonable to expect vet practices to actively promote online pharmacies, which are in direct competition for customers and some of which are run by large veterinary groups. In addition, the proposed £16 price cap for prescriptions will be ineffective and is unlikely to lead to lower vet bills for consumers.”

    Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
    Previous ArticleNew research suggests that imidacloprid levels in water are lower than previously reported, and are falling
    Next Article RUMA Agriculture releases its latest Targets Task Force report
    mm
    Simon King

    Editor - Over The Counter. Simon has more than 20 years’ experience in B2B publishing. When not slumped over his PC, Simon is a keen follower of sport, supporting Manchester United, and is at his absolute happiest watching most sport in glorious UHD, with something cold to drink by his side.

    Read Similar Stories

    Farms hold key to break rodenticide resistance spread

    New calculator helps optimise pig and broiler feed strategies

    New environmental index launched to cut UK sheep flock carbon footprint

    Most Read

    Farms hold key to break rodenticide resistance spread

    June 3, 2026

    New calculator helps optimise pig and broiler feed strategies

    June 2, 2026

    New environmental index launched to cut UK sheep flock carbon footprint

    June 1, 2026

    Any animal medicine advertising or promotion should conform to the ‘code of practice’ of the National Office of Animal Health (NOAH).
    For full details contact the publisher or www.noah.co.uk.

    Lewis Business Media Ltd endeavours to make articles and statements as accurate as possible.

    © 2026 Lewis Business Media. All Rights Reserved.
    Lewis Business Media, Suite A, Arun House, Office Village, River Way, Uckfield, TN22 1SL

    Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms & Conditions

    The OTC "tick" mechanism is the copyright of Lewis Business Media Ltd ©2025

    • Pet Business World
    • Pest

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    OvertheCounter
    Managing Your Privacy

    To provide the best digital experience, we use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to our use of cookies allows us to process data such as reading behaviour. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    Cookie Preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}